Collection: | Athens, National Archaeological Museum |
Title: | Grave monument of seated young woman with three other figures |
Context: | Probably from Athens |
Findspot: | Said to be from Athens (various locations--Ambelokipi, Patission, and the Piraios--have all been suggested) |
Summary: | Seated young woman with three other figures |
Object Function: | Funerary |
Material: | Marble |
Sculpture Type: | Stele, relief-decorated |
Category: | Single monument |
Style: | Late Classical |
Technique: | High relief |
Original or Copy: | Original |
Date: | ca. 340 BC |
Dimensions: | H. 1.80 m; W. 1.22 m |
Scale: | Life-size |
Region: | Attica |
Period: | Late Classical |
Subject Description:
A young woman, seated profile to the right, on a cushioned stool (diphros), with her sandal-clad feet on a footstool, shakes hands with a tall female figure, standing in 3/4-view to the left, who is dressed similarly in a chiton and himation. She bows her head, which is covered (as is the rest of her body, wrapped in a chiton) by her himation. Behind her (carved in low relief) are a girl (a slave wearing a sleeved tunic and a sakkos), leaning her head on her left hand, and a bearded man, wearing a himation, who holds both hands on the left side of his chest, resting on a staff. Both of these figures are shown in near frontal view.
Clairmont suggests reasonably that the seated woman is the mother of Philino, who shakes hands with her, while her husband, Thoukritos, Philino's father, stands behind them.
Form & Style: Conze noted that the pediment (from the naiskos which originally enclosed this relief) was found in a private house, and preserved the names of the figures: only the second is well preserved.
Condition: Intact
Condition Description: Most of the relief is intact.
Material Description: "Pentelic" according to Clairmont
Inscription: The inscription on the architrave (now missing) was transcribed as follows:
Inscription Bibliography: IG II.2, 6012
Collection History: Karouzou reports that the relief was brought to the National Museum in 1889. Vierneisel-Schlörb has recently suggested that the architrave, and attached inscription, do not belong to this relief
Sources Used:
Other Bibliography: AM 96 (1981) 197 f.; AJA 7 (1891) 17, pl. 2.